Brooks Koepka's return to the PGA has given a lifeline to DeChambeau, Smith and Rahm to return and leave LIV Golf
GOLF NEWS

DeChambeau, Rahm and Smith now have a clear path back to PGA after Koepka allowed to return

Koepka officially welcomed back

The PGA Tour has formally accepted Brooks Koepka back into its ranks, ending four years away from the circuit. The five time major champion will return later this month under a newly created returning member programme. His reinstatement follows his departure from LIV Golf at the end of last year. The decision immediately alters the balance of power in men’s professional golf.

Koepka will make his competitive comeback at the Farmers Insurance Open at Torrey Pines in late January. His return comes earlier than expected, despite Tour rules previously indicating he would be ineligible until August. PGA Tour leadership has instead opted for a fast tracked route. That approach signals a clear shift in strategy.

Significant financial consequences

Koepka’s return has not come without serious financial sacrifice. He has agreed to make a $5m charitable donation as part of his reinstatement. He will also forfeit any FedExCup Bonus payments during the 2026 season. Those conditions represent a substantial concession.

Perhaps more significantly, Koepka will be excluded from the PGA Tour’s player equity programme until 2030. The Tour estimates this could cost him between $50m and $85m depending on performance and future growth. Officials have described it as one of the largest financial repercussions in professional sports history. The penalties underline the Tour’s intent to balance reconciliation with consequence.

A door opens for LIV’s biggest names

By allowing Koepka back, the PGA Tour has created a clear pathway for other major winners. Jon Rahm, Bryson DeChambeau and Cameron Smith all meet the eligibility criteria. Each has won either a major or The Players Championship during the defined window. That alignment is no coincidence.

The programme applies only to players absent from the PGA Tour for at least two years. It also requires a major or Players Championship victory between 2022 and 2025. Under those terms, Phil Mickelson is excluded. The criteria appear carefully designed. They target LIV’s most valuable remaining assets.

How can Rahm, DeChambeau and Smith come back?

Any return for LIV’s remaining stars would involve complex legal and financial negotiations. Contracts with LIV include team obligations, appearance commitments and exit clauses. Players would likely face significant buyout costs. That process could quickly become expensive and contentious.

There is also the issue of unwinding LIV team agreements and sponsorship arrangements. Unlike Koepka, some players have been deeply embedded in LIV’s structure. Legal disputes could arise if exits are challenged. The risk of prolonged litigation remains real.

A power play by the PGA

The February deadline represents a deliberate power play by the PGA Tour. By imposing a firm cut off, the Tour has forced players to act decisively. Hesitation now carries consequences. Control has shifted away from LIV.

This deadline also allows the PGA Tour to shape its competitive landscape for 2026. It creates certainty ahead of schedule reforms and commercial planning. The message is clear and uncompromising. Koepka’s return may prove to be only the beginning.

A limited and deliberate window

PGA Tour chief executive Brian Rolapp has been clear that the offer is time limited. The reinstatement window closes on 2 February. After that date, there is no guarantee a similar route will exist again. The message to LIV players is stark.

Rolapp has described the programme as a response to a unique set of circumstances. He has insisted it does not set a precedent for future cases. That framing allows flexibility without abandoning principle. It also places immediate pressure on undecided players.

LIV responds as pressure mounts

LIV Golf responded swiftly to the announcement, reiterating its long term vision. The league stressed its commitment to an open ecosystem and global growth. It maintained confidence in its competitive and financial offering. However, the timing of the statement felt defensive.

The breakaway tour understands the stakes involved. Losing Rahm, DeChambeau or Smith would be a significant blow. Their presence underpins LIV’s credibility with fans and broadcasters. Koepka’s return has intensified uncertainty around LIV’s future.

A calculated power shift

Rolapp’s handling of the situation has been widely viewed as assertive. By offering reinstatement without suspension time, he has seized the initiative. The move places LIV on the back foot. It also reinforces the PGA Tour’s renewed authority.

The strategy appears designed to test LIV’s resolve. Financial penalties may deter some players, but competitive ambition could outweigh them. Koepka’s willingness to accept harsh terms sends a powerful signal. Others may now follow.

GolfTimes
Andy Barr
the authorAndy Barr
Editor of GolfTimes
Editor of GolfTimes.co.uk, I’m a communications and marketing professional with a background in global sports branding. I’ve worked alongside major clubs and helped launch sports brands from the ground up, blending strategic storytelling with commercial goals. I also make the odd appearance on news shows to discuss the intersection of sport, branding, and media. - When I’m not editing features or chasing down quotes, I’m usually on the course. I’ve been playing golf for over 10 years and currently play off a 14 handicap. My favourite course I’ve played is Bowood — a brilliant layout with plenty to think about. The toughest course I’ve faced? Bude. The weather was wild, the bounces unpredictable, and my swing decisions… debatable. Still, it’s the rounds like that which keep the game interesting. And humbling.